Peart v. Carreras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to authorize federal funds for experts to testify at state clemency hearing
• holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to authorize federal funds for experts to testify at state clemency hearing
• holding that § 3599 does not provide for the federal appointment and funding of counsel to bring a new state court post-conviction proceeding unrelated to any federal claim
• holding that § 3599 does not provide for the federal appointment and funding of counsel to bring a new state court post-conviction proceeding unrelated to any federal claim
• “[A]n indigent prisoner . . . may receive § 3599 funding only for those proceedings that ordinarily occur subsequent to [the filing of a § 2254 petition].”
• “[A]n indigent prisoner . . . may receive § 3599 funding only for those proceedings that ordinarily occur subsequent to [the filing of a § 2254 petition].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).