Pearson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling prosecution timely where information was filed a year after the primary limitations period because “the appellant was continuously absent from the state and his absence resulted in the tolling of the statute of limitations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brian Michael Robinson v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-11-17· cited 3×
• Wilkerson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-06· cited 3×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-11-24· cited 2×
• BAMBA v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-10
• Barritt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-10-16
• Thompson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-27

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Novaton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-03-24· cited 172×
• Sirmons v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-02-03· cited 99×
• State v. Miller
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-14· cited 12×
• Weitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-05· cited 8×
• Hubbard v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-09· cited 8×
• Netherly v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-19· cited 8×
• DeLoach v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-16· cited 1×