Pearson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• wherein we held that the appellant's five Illinois convictions were properly treated as five separate convictions under Alabama law, even though they would be treated as one conviction under Illinois law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Barton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1986-07-15· cited 20×
• Esters v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1985-12-10· cited 17×
• Manning v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-03-16· cited 8×
• Nguyen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-09-20· cited 6×
• McLeod v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-12-30· cited 3×
• Beck v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1989-10-27· cited 2×
• Madden v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-11-15· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Douglas v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 1,939×
• Donahoo v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-02-20· cited 25×
• Ex Parte Donahoo
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1979-05-25· cited 15×
• Brown v. State.
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1975-07-29· cited 12×
• Ex Parte Nikolic
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1980-02-12· cited 9×
• Nikolic v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-12-18· cited 9×
• Douglas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-01-16· cited 8×