Skip to main content
· 3/8/1989

Pearson v. Parsons

Citations

  • 541 So. 2d 447
  • 1989 WL 21986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Rules of Civil Procedure applicable where not in conflict with statutory procedures regarding election contests
  • \withdrawal from representation of both counsel who were to be witnesses on contested issues was required\
  • The rule against advocate- witnesses “is not an immunity from testifying by the advocate witness, but it is a limitation on advocacy.”
  • “withdrawal from representation of both counsel who were to be witnesses on contested issues was required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee, P.J., and Prather and Pittman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.