Pearson v. Paradise Ford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the 2003 amendments to section 440.09(l)(b) were intended to \overrule” this court's interpretation of the phrase \major contributing cause” in Closet Maid v. Sykes, 763 So.2d 377 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (en banc)
• refusing to interpret a provision of chapter 440 in a manner that would lead to an absurd result not intended by the legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).