Skip to main content
· 3/15/1994

Pearson v. Lincoln Telephone Co.

Citations

  • 513 N.W.2d 361
  • 2 Neb. Ct. App. 703
  • 1994 Neb. App. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing the impact of the amended Nebraska Workers ’ Compensation Act on the scope of appellate review
  • doctor’s opinion that noise exposure on job “ ‘may be related’ ” to hearing loss is insufficient proof of causation as matter of law
  • order vacating dismissal and remanding for trial is final and appealable order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sievers, Irwin, Miller-Lerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.