Skip to main content
· 6/10/1957

Pearson v. Gray

Citations

  • 354 U.S. 907

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming Rule 11 sanctions when party filed a complaint “which it must Nos. 22-2623 & 23-1770 9 have known completely lacked a factual foundation for subject matter jurisdiction”
  • affirming Rule 11 sanctions when party filed a complaint “which it must Nos. 22-2623 & 23-1770 9 have known completely lacked a factual foundation for subject matter jurisdiction”
  • affirming Rule 11 sanctions when party filed a complaint “which it must Nos. 22-2623 & 23-1770 9 have known completely lacked a factual foundation for subject matter jurisdiction”
  • affirming Rule 11 sanctions when party filed a complaint “which it must Nos. 22-2623 & 23-1770 9 have known completely lacked a factual foundation for subject matter jurisdiction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.