Pearson v. Bachner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting untimely Rule 60(b)(6) motion for prejudgment interest filed two and a half years after judgment
• Rule 60(b) motion is not a substitute for an appeal of a judgment
• “The policies that finality of judgments be favored and that Rule 60(b)(1) motions not be substitutes for appeals, counsel that a motion for relief based on a subsequent change in law be made within the time for appeal from the judgment.”
• two and one-half year delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).