Skip to main content
· 6/9/1924

Pearman v. United States

Citations

  • 12 Ct. Cust. 284
  • 1924 WL 26658
  • 1924 CCPA LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “deliberate indifference” if a fact-based inquiry which should not be summarily disposed of without an adequate record
  • concluding that even short exposure to bitter cold may violate Eighth Amendment
  • recognizing prisoner’s Bivens claim alleging that he was forced to live in bitterly cold cell
  • explaining that “deliberate indifference de- scribes a state of mind more blameworthy than negli- gence”
  • upholding reasonableness of digital rectal search against Eighth Amendment challenge because there was no evidence that officials undertook search in “malicious and sadistic fashion for the very purpose of causing harm”
  • discussing the guile with which prisoners have se- creted dangerous objects and contraband

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barber, Bland, Hatfield, Martin, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.