· 12/24/1992
Pearlstein v. King
Citations
- 610 So. 2d 445
- 1992 WL 381760
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying a new rule to pending cases was “not a true retroactive application” where its application “put[] no extra burden on prior filings and d[id] not diminish the time for complying with the rule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McDonald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.