Pearlman v. Reliance Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that East River involved an identical claim
• applying economic loss rule and stating that product means finished product bargained for by purchaser
• noting that East River involved an identical claim
• “product” means the finished product bargained for by the buyer, not the individual component parts of the product
• in the context of tort for economic loss, product means the finished product bargained for by the purchaser
• parties had not bargained separately for vessel's defective steering mechanism; therefore, defective components making up vessel as a whole could not cause “other property” damage

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).