Skip to main content
· 7/16/2002

Pearl Murphy and Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of Education

Citations

  • 297 F.3d 195
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14392
  • 2002 WL 1560062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff need not exhaust administrative remedies to pursue a stay-put order
  • declining to vacate, on appeal in which minor was represented by counsel, the district court's judgment in favor of a minor represented there by his non-lawyer parents
  • finding “then current placement” to mean the last agreed upon placement when the due process proceeding commenced
  • declining to vacate, on appeal in which minor was represented by counsel, the district court’s judgment in favor of a minor represented there by his non-lawyer parents
  • “The plaintiffs failure to exhaust administrative remedies ordinarily deprives this court of subject matter jurisdiction over any IDEA claims.”
  • “Congress also included within the IDEA procedural safeguards that enable parents and students to challenge the local educational agency’s decisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Leval, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.