Pearce's Administrator v. Pearce

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing complaint for coverage of underlying complaint for bankers’ roles in a Ponzi scheme where policy clearly and plainly excluded professional services claims
• “Although the term ‘professional services’ is undefined in the Policies, the Court concludes that the term is unambiguous and that banking services constitute professional services.”
• a professional services exclusion in a policy issued to a company offering banking services was not illusory because it provided coverage for claims not involving professional services
• “[A]n insurer’s duty to defend its insured against legal action depends solely on the facts and legal theories alleged in the pleadings and the claims against the insured.” (citing Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. JDC (Am.) Corp., 52 F.3d 1575, 1580 (11th Cir. 1995)
• \[A]n insurer's duty to defend its insured against legal action depends solely on the facts and legal theories alleged in the pleadings and the claims against the insured.\ (citing Lawyers Title Ins. Corp. v. JDC (Am.) Corp. , 52 F.3d 1575 , 1580 (11th Cir. 1995) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).