Skip to main content
· 1/26/1929

Pearce v. Union Nat. Bank

Citations

  • 33 F.2d 997
  • 1929 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “that the class members were effectively defendants resisting financial demands by the attorneys... makes the jurisdictional shortcoming clear and establishes that the judgment is not entitled to full faith and credit”
  • Easterbrook, J., joined by Posner, C.J., and Manion, Rovner, and Diane P. Wood, JJ., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc
  • Easterbrook, J., joined by Posner, C.J., and Manion, Rovner, and Diane P. Wood, JJ., dissenting from denial of rehearing en bane
  • the substantial jurisdictional problems “were aggravated by the class members’ ignorance of their exposure”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hahn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.