Pearce v. Desper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a party that resists discovery “is in no position to complain now that the defendant lacked the information [the party] refused to furnish”
• “The words ‘subject to’ do not indicate an understanding that the mortgage was to be assumed.”
• “The words ‘subject to’ do not indicate an understanding that the mortgage was to be assumed.”
• “The words ‘subject to’ do not indicate an understanding that the mortgage was to be assumed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).