Peapack-Gladstone v. Borough of Peapack-Gladstone Land Use Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although the developer’s period of preliminary approval terminated by operation of law, “the developer’s protection from rezoning changes was re-established . . . when the Board granted final major subdivision approval”
• reiterating the judiciary's limited standard of review of A-3744-18T1 13 local land use decisions
• affirming the \judiciary's limited standard of review of local land use decisions\
• “The procedures employed in Whispering Woods have since been approved in other land use cases.”
• “As a separate basis for tolling, the filing of the first lawsuit by plaintiff . . . also substantially thwarted the developer’s ability to proceed with construction.”
• “[T]he pendency of the current appeal and the underlying Law Division proceedings on plaintiff’s second lawsuit (which have consumed more than two years to date) tolled the time for construction . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).