Peal v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• categorizing as “disingenuous” the plaintiff’s claim that he was unaware that he should not delete certain programs and files on his computer where the defendant had repeatedly served the plaintiff with discovery requests regarding the device
• “[T]he real surprise is that a litigant would have the audacity to discard his old hard drive and delete tens of thousands of electronic files with sophisticated data-wiping programs and then cry foul that his opponents should not be surprised.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).