Peak v. Ratliff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming judgment notwithstanding the verdict on behalf of defendants because the plaintiffs failed to show reckless conduct or gross negligence
• quoting, Anderson v. Moulder, 183 W.Va. 77, 394 S.E.2d 61 (1990)
• where the West Virginia Supreme Court held that the statutory language “clearly suggests that the emergency driver is accountable only for reckless acts or gross negligence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).