Peacock v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding deputy’s testimony giving a visual comparison of appellant’s tires to casts made from tire prints found at the robbery victim’s premises was not improper because “[o]ne does not have to be specially trained in order to make a visual comparison of this character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Floyd v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 117×
• Johnston v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-13· cited 98×
• Bolin v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2010-07-01· cited 82×
• Nardone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-07· cited 75×
• Jones v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1983-09-15· cited 50×
• Floyd v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-17· cited 43×
• Reynolds v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-09-27· cited 32×
• In Interest of JH
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-13· cited 11×
• White v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-10· cited 6×
• ANDREW WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-07-15
• Peacock v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1964-06-15
• Watts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-05-15
• Eichelberger v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-11-17
• Sharnika Lashay Moore-Bryant v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-05-15

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Romanello v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1964-02-04· cited 30×