Peabody v. Walgreen Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that conference where Commonwealth and trial counsel questioned jurors about off-the-record comment they overheard was not critical stage of trial
• stating that \testimony was not necessary to avoid prejudice to [the a]ppellant because [the] proffered testimony was cumulative of evidence already presented by the defense\
• concluding that record supported “PCRA court’s factual finding that no undisclosed agreement existed[ that] was suppressed by the Commonwealth” despite “that other evidence presented at the PCRA evidentiary hearing suggested that an oral agreement may have been reached”
• concluding defendant failed to show prejudice where testimony cumulative of evidence already presented in appellant’s defense
• holding the appellant failed to demonstrate prejudice where the proposed witness’s testimony would have been merely cumulative of other evidence
• finding that the Commonwealth does not violate Brady when it does not disclose a criminal record that the accused could have obtained

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).