Peabody v. Rotan Mosle, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arbitrator’s failure to disclose that his law partner’s brother was the expert witness’ attorney did not show evident partiality because the relationship was “trivial”
• where the brother of the arbitrator’s law partner was once the personal attorney of a witness to the arbitration proceeding, the arbitration award was not vacated
• not requiring disclosure of attorney-client relationship between the arbitrator’s former law partner’s brother and an expert witness, as this relationship was “thrice removed” from the arbitrator and thus too attenuated
• where the brother of the arbitrator’s law partner was once the personal attorney of a witness to the arbitration proceeding, the relationship was too remote and trivial to require that the arbitration award be' vacated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).