Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1/15/1868
Peabody v. Norfolk
Citations
- 98 Mass. 452
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing trade secret protection by equity courts
- recognizing trade secret protection by equity courts
- recognizing trade secret protection by equity courts
- there is a property interest in process of manufacturing “which a court of chancery will protect against one who in violation of contract and breach of confidence undertakes to apply it to his own use, or to disclose it to third persons”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 566×
- Hyde Corporation v. HuffinesTexas Supreme Court· 1958-03-12· cited 232×
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1972-05-17· cited 136×
- Franke v. WiltschekSecond Circuit· 1953-12-09· cited 129×
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. Execuquest Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1998-03-05· cited 112×
- Jet Spray Cooler, Inc. v. CramptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-01-26· cited 109×
- AO Smith Corporation v. Petroleum Iron Works Co.Sixth Circuit· 1934-11-10· cited 107×
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1907-04-06· cited 96×
- Chadwick v. CovellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1890-02-27· cited 63×
- Butterick Publishing Co. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-09-08· cited 58×
- Tex. Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc. v. Renesas Elecs. Am., Inc.Federal Circuit· 2018-05-01· cited 57×
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.S.D. California· 1958-10-23· cited 51×
- Junker v. PlummerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1946-07-01· cited 51×
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeE.D. Louisiana· 1967-01-11· cited 48×
- Aktiebolaget Bofors v. United States (Two Cases). Aktiebolaget Bofors v. Acheson, Secretary of StateD.C. Circuit· 1951-11-29· cited 47×
- Sandlin v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 1944-03-27· cited 47×
- Harrison v. Glucose Sugar Refining Co.Seventh Circuit· 1902-05-06· cited 47×
- William P. Tavoulareas v. The Washington Post Company, D/B/A the Washington Post, a Delaware Corporation Appeal of Mobil CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1984-03-15· cited 46×
- Stone v. GossSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1903-07-23· cited 46×
- John D. Park & Sons Co. v. HartmanSixth Circuit· 1907-03-14· cited 46×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.