Peabody Coal Co. v. Gossett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that remedial statutes may have retroactive application
• holding that remedial statutes may have retroactive application
• “[I]t can be seen from the above commentary that since the 1987 amendment to KRS 342.125 is remedial, it does not come within the legal conception of a retrospective law nor the general rule against the retrospective operation of statutes.”
• new standard for reopening workers' compensation awards applied retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).