PE Ashton Company v. Joyner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the insured is entitled to the broadest protection that he could reasonably believe the commonly understood meaning of [the terms used in an insurance policy] afforded him”
• “ ‘theft’ . . . [includes] the wilful taking or appropriation of one person’s property by another, wrongfully and without justification . . The respondent relies on Great American Indemnity Company v. Yoder, 131 A.2d 401 (D.C. Mun. Ct. App. 1957

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).