Pazur v. Belcher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• appellant failed to distinguish an officer’s liability for torts he personally participated in from his liability for corporate debts due to a piercing of the corporate veil
• “Sole ownership of a corporation by one person or another corporation is not a factor, and neither is the fact that the sole owner uses and controls it to promote his ends. There must be evidence of abuse of the corporate form.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).