Skip to main content
· 7/14/2004

Paz v. Roe

Citations

  • 103 F. App'x 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a newspaper publisher’s report was not defamatory because, although it used more colorful language than the official proceeding, it did not “suggest more serious conduct than that actually suggested in the official proceeding”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.