Paz v. City of Miami

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant lacked standing where he was not a party to any intercepted conversations nor were his premises the site of any electronic surveillance
• “[Alderman] held that suppression can only be obtained by those persons whose rights were violated by the search itself, which in a wiretap situation would be those persons whose conversations were intercepted or whose premises were the site of electronic surveillance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).