Skip to main content

Payton v. State

Citations

  • 897 So. 2d 921
  • 2003 WL 22510533

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in refusing to grant continuance when untimely disclosed evidence concerned trivial matters
  • finding that the trial court’s failure to grant a continuance was harmless error, in part, because the evidence adequately supported the verdict and because the jury would have convicted the defendant even without the evidence in question
  • finding no abuse of discretion when \jurors assured the court and the attorneys that their familiarity with witnesses would not influence their ability to be fair and impartial\
  • decisions on Rule 9.04 and motions for continuance are within the trial court’s discretion
  • “Public policy requires a finality to litigation.”
  • “Public policy requires a finality to litigation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: En Banc

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

85 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.