Payton v. Cullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Having retained qualified experts, it was not objectively unreasonable for [the attorney] not to seek others.”
• “Having retained qualified experts, it was not objectively unreasonable for [the attorney] not to seek others.”
• finding petitioner was not prejudiced where 4 omitted evidence of childhood “experience is not comparable to those in other cases where 5 courts have found a reasonable probability that the outcome would have been different”
• dismissing Eighth Amendment claim in the absence of any protocol as unripe
• “We do not believe that disclosure [of the new evidence] makes it reasonably probable that the outcome would have been different.”
• claim unripe because no protocol in place following state court invalidation of existing protocol

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).