Payne v. Whiting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cost to repair damage to plaintiff’s pond caused by runoff water held recoverable
• defendant changed flow of water and thereby caused accumulation of sediment in plaintiff's pond; plaintiff built sediment pond to cure, brought suit, and court allowed recovery of cost clear sediment from the original pond — i.e., restoration cost; court did not elaborate on relative costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).