Payne v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• child’s exposure to pornography irrelevant to show nonchastity or preoccupation with sex but relevant as reason for child’s knowledge when child recanted allegations—though court said defense could show knowledge without specifying pornography as mechanism
• child's exposure to pornography irrelevant to show nonchastity or preoccupation with sex but relevant as reason for child's knowledge when child recanted allegations—though court said defense could show knowledge without specifying pornography as mechanism

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• White v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-02-04· cited 79×
• State v. Marks
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2011-08-11· cited 21×
• Tidwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-01· cited 12×
• Walker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-03· cited 3×
• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-04· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-07-03· cited 52×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-02-07· cited 35×
• State v. Abdi
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1982-03-12· cited 24×
• Dotson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-04-13· cited 22×
• Carson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-12-04· cited 21×
• Cantrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-03-24· cited 8×
• Venson v. State of GA
  Eleventh Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 5×
• Pope v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-10-22· cited 4×