Payne v. Progressive Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A live controversy must exist at every stage of the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• David Hooks v. Landmark Industries, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-08-12· cited 35×
• American Precision v. Mineral Wells
  Fifth Circuit· 2024-01-12· cited 22×
• Verde v. Stoneridge, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2015-09-22· cited 7×
• Jenkins v. Pech
  D. Nebraska· 2014-08-27· cited 5×
• Abramov v. I.C. System, Inc.
  E.D. New York· 2014-12-12· cited 3×
• Sandoz v. Cingular Wireless LLC
  W.D. Louisiana· 2015-06-02

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
  Supreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
• Bell v. Hood
  Supreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 4,157×
• Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Maryland
  Supreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 1,977×
• Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. Symczyk
  Supreme Court· 2013-04-16· cited 1,227×
• Chafin v. Chafin
  Supreme Court· 2013-02-19· cited 949×
• Richard Weiss, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Regal Collections Lancer Investments, Inc
  Third Circuit· 2004-09-29· cited 213×
• Warren v. Sessoms & Rogers, P.A.
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-01-11· cited 71×
• Wesley Eubanks v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Defendants
  Fifth Circuit· 1986-10-17· cited 54×
• Blanche M. Dellapietro v. ARS National Services, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 2012-08-27· cited 51×
• Elton Gates and Luster Nelson, Individually and on Behalf of a Class v. B. Towery
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-11-29· cited 39×
• Diaz v. First American Home Buyers Protection Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 2013-10-04· cited 39×
• Christopher Hrivnak v. NCO Portfolio Management Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 2013-06-11· cited 30×
• ANR Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
  Fifth Circuit· 2011-07-19· cited 13×