· 1/15/1857
Payne v. Danley
Citations
- 18 Ark. 446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- CDA did not apply to a “barter” contract for an easement over real property in exchange for government improvements
- “To determine if the contract is one for the procurement of property, the Court ,.. will examine the definition of ‘procurement’ [and] ... the purpose and legislative history of the CDA.”
- “To determine if the contract is one for the procurement of property, the Court ... will examine the definition of ‘procurement’ [and] ... the purpose and legislative history of the CDA”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hanly, Hon, Scott, Tuos
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.