Skip to main content
· 1/15/1857

Payne v. Danley

Citations

  • 18 Ark. 446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • CDA did not apply to a “barter” contract for an easement over real property in exchange for government improvements
  • “To determine if the contract is one for the procurement of property, the Court ,.. will examine the definition of ‘procurement’ [and] ... the purpose and legislative history of the CDA.”
  • “To determine if the contract is one for the procurement of property, the Court ... will examine the definition of ‘procurement’ [and] ... the purpose and legislative history of the CDA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hanly, Hon, Scott, Tuos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.