Payne v. Cayhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “in deciding a motion to dismiss” for lack of standing, “we accept as true the [plaintiffs’] allegations of injury, causation, and redressability”
• holding allegations of likely future harm from adversary winning a motion were “neither conjectural nor hypothetical and [were] sufficiently imminent to constitute an injury in fact”
• permitting a third party to intervene to enforce consent agreement’s proper scope
• “Parents have standing to sue when practices and policies of a school threaten their rights and interests and those of their children.”
• “Parents have standing to sue when practices and policies of a school threaten their rights and interests and those of their children.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).