Payne by and Through Payne v. Myers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that state-employed “doctors[,] as governmental employees[,] had no immunity from suit for their simple negligence” absent statutory grant of immunity
• finding that plaintiffs were not denied a remedy under article I, section 11: Even though they were barred from suing individual state doctors under section 63-30-4, they would have had remedy against State itself if they filed notice of claim within statutorily required period
• finding that plaintiffs were not denied a remedy under article I, section 11: Even though they were barred from suing individual state doctors under section 63-30-4, they would have had remedy against State itself if they filed notice of claim within statutorily required period
• \'This [clourt has held that a vested right of action is a property right protected by the due process clause.\
• suit against the State for negligence in lieu of suit against state employee
• suit against the State for negligence in lieu of suit against state employee

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).