· 4/20/1994
Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.
Citations
- 640 A.2d 1234
- 536 Pa. 583
- 1994 Pa. LEXIS 140
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that \[t]he enforceability of the [family car] exclusion is dependent upon the factual circumstances presented in each case.\
- noting that “[t]he enforceability of the [family car] exclusion is dependent upon the factual circumstances presented in each case”
- stating that “family car exclusion” valid where plaintiff attempts to convert UIM coverage into liability coverage, but otherwise invalid as against public policy
- stating application of public policy concerns in determining the validity of an insurance exclusion depends on the factual circumstances presented in each case
- upholding family vehicle exclusion in the context of a single car accident where the insured was trying to convert UIM coverage into liability coverage
- stating application of public policy concerns in determining the validity of an insurance exclusion depends on the factual circumstances presented in each case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro, Flaherty, Docket, Larsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.