Skip to main content
· 4/20/1994

Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 640 A.2d 1234
  • 536 Pa. 583
  • 1994 Pa. LEXIS 140

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \[t]he enforceability of the [family car] exclusion is dependent upon the factual circumstances presented in each case.\
  • noting that “[t]he enforceability of the [family car] exclusion is dependent upon the factual circumstances presented in each case”
  • stating that “family car exclusion” valid where plaintiff attempts to convert UIM coverage into liability coverage, but otherwise invalid as against public policy
  • stating application of public policy concerns in determining the validity of an insurance exclusion depends on the factual circumstances presented in each case
  • upholding family vehicle exclusion in the context of a single car accident where the insured was trying to convert UIM coverage into liability coverage
  • stating application of public policy concerns in determining the validity of an insurance exclusion depends on the factual circumstances presented in each case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nix, Zappala, Papadakos, Cappy, Castille, Montemuro, Flaherty, Docket, Larsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.