PAYDAY TODAY, INC. v. DeFREEUW

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Indiana Trial Rule 8(E)(2) allows a party to plead alternative and even inconsistent theories of recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gregg Appliances, Inc., and HHGregg, Inc. v. Dwain Underwood, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22
• Central Indiana Podiatry, P.C., Northwest Surgery Center, LLC, d/b/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, f/k/a Foot & Ankle Surgery Center, LLC and Anthony E. Miller, D.P.M. v. Barnes & Thornburg, LLP
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-10-19

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bartrom v. Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1993-07-20· cited 65×
• Art Country Squire, L.L.C. v. Inland Mortgage Corp.
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2001-04-10· cited 40×
• Livingston v. Fast Cash USA, Inc.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2001-08-16· cited 25×
• Randles v. Indiana Patient's Compensation Fund
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-02-06· cited 12×
• Cash in a Flash, Inc. v. McCullough
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-09-08· cited 6×