Paxton-Mitchell Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting ‘product’ in the absence of a contractual definition as referring to those things in which the insured “trades or deals”
• interpreting “product” in the absence of a contractual definition as referring to those things in which the insured “trades or deals”
• narrow definition of \handled\ as \to deal or trade in\ is more logical and between two business parties that definition of the word would be intended
• if a complaint contains some allegations of conduct or damage excluded from the policy but others that fall within policy coverage or can reasonably be interpreted to fall within coverage, there is a duty to defend
• “If the complaint contains some allegations of conduct or damage excluded from the policy but has other allegations which would fall within the policy coverage, the insurer has a duty to defend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).