Paxson v. Board of Education of School District No. 87

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs’ expressio unius argument because “it is generally improper to conclude that entities not specifically enumerated are excluded when the legislature uses the word ‘including.’ ”
• finding “the word ‘including,’ in its most commonly understood meaning, to be a term of enlargement, not of limitation”
• “including, but not limited to” reflected intent that list of claims not be considered exclusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).