Skip to main content
· 11/28/2016

Pawelski v. United States

Citations

  • 137 S. Ct. 515
  • 85 U.S.L.W. 3260
  • 196 L. Ed. 2d 420
  • 2016 WL 5874708
  • 2016 U.S. LEXIS 7259

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a school district’s individualized education program was adequate, but that the parents were nonetheless entitled to reimbursement on a pendency basis
  • “[A]n SRO decision that agrees with the parents that a change of placement is appropriate . . . must be treated as such an agreement.”
  • “A claim for tuition reimbursement pursuant to the stay-put provision is evaluated independently from the evaluation of a claim for tuition reimbursement pursuant to the inadequacy of an IEP.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.