Pavone v. Pavone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting out rule from Restatement about when contract is unenforceable as being against public policy
• affirming the superior court's holding that a father could not force his son to return a fishing permit because the son's oral promise to do so contravened the permit retransfer restrictions of AS 16.43.150(g)(2), where the son raised the illegality of the contract as a defense
• affirming the superior court’s holding that a father could not force his son to return a fishing permit because the son’s oral promise to do so contravened the permit retransfer restrictions of AS 16.43.150(g)(2), where the son raised the illegality of the contract as a defense
• adopting the Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 178(1) (1981)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).