Pavick v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.
Citations
- 225 F. 395
- 1914 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1263
Syllabus
<p>Removal of Causes <§=»12—“Proper District.”</p> <p>The “proper district,” within Judicial Code (Act March 3, 1911, c. 231, 36 Stat. 1094 [Comp. St. 1913, § 101OJ) § 28, designating the suits brought in a state court subject to removal by defendant to the federal courts “for the proper district,” is defined by section 29 (section 1011), providing that a party “entitled” to remove any such suit may do so by filing a petition for the removal of such suit into the District Court to be held “in the district where such .suit is pending,” and is not the district in which, under section 51 (section 1033), the suit could have properly been brought originally.</p> <p><£s»For other eases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER m all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p> <p>[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Removal of Causes, Cent. Dig. §§ 32, 33; Dec. Dig. <§=^12.</p> <p>For other definitions, see Words and Phrases, Second Series, Proper District.]</p> <p><§»For other cases see same topic & KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests & Indexes</p>
Judges: Geiger
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.