Pavel Menn v. Conmed Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• sustaining in part and remanding in part Certain Ferrosilicon from Venezuela, 58 Fed.Reg. 27,539 (final aff. determination & CVD order), as amended, 58 Fed.Reg. 36,394 (Dep’t Comm.1993)
• “Plaintiffs can provide no authority requiring Commerce to consistently apply GAAP in all aspects of countervailing duty investigations.”
• “That [a Venezuelan Government-owned holding company] exercised some control over [a Venezuelan producer of ferrosilicon] does not necessarily indicate that the benefit to [the holding company] passed through to [the producer].”
• “[W]here a company is equity-worthy, as here, it does not necessarily follow that the purchase of stock from that company will be consistent with commercial considerations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).