Paulson v. Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant did not have to show an actual claim to title in order to file a notice of lis pendens
• holding that the defendant did not have to show an actual claim to title in order to file a notice of lis pendens
• stating that a “second purpose of the notice [of lis pendens] is to alert third parties interested in the subject property, thereby protecting them from litigation attendant to the property”
• notice of lis pendens filed in connection with action for injunction to prevent construction on or sale of land is absolutely privileged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).