Paulling v. Sturgus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the collection of taxes does not amount to a prohibited Fifth Amendment taking
• holding that the lawful collection of taxes does not amount to a prohibited Fifth Amendment taking
• holding that the collection of taxes does not amount to a prohibited Fifth Amendment taking
• reasoning that plaintiffs’ pro se status supported finding that transfer was in interest of justice and collecting cases in support of that proposition
• holding that the Court of Federal Claims is without authority to transfer a ease to the Tax Court even if it is in the interest of justice to do so and the action could have been brought in the Tax Court, because the Tax Court is not specifically enumerated in section 610
• noting that transferor court must lack subject matter jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).