Skip to main content
· 5/13/2002

Paulissen v. US LIFE INS. CO. IN CITY OF NY

Citations

  • 205 F. Supp. 2d 1120
  • 54 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1257
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10117
  • 2002 WL 1270908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding deceased’s HAPE “was not a disorder of a somewhat established or settled character” but “a mere temporary disorder ... arising from sudden and unexpected derangement of the system” (internal quotations and alterations omitted)
  • remarking that they “would include the slightest and most temporary ailment”
  • applying California law’s distinction “between policies that cover ‘accidental death’ and those that cover death by ‘accidental means’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.