Pauline Danner v. Phillips Petroleum Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an employee’s complaint that her job was “just taken from [her] and given to a man” encompassed not just her termination but the company policies that led to the termination
• allegations of post-EEOC complaint incidents distinguished from supplemental legal theories based on pre-complaint incidents
• In discussing whether the scope of the judicial inquiry should be limited by the EEOC charge, the court stated that after all “Mrs. Danner is not a lawyer.” Danner at 161
• Tuttle & Wisdom, and Brown, C. J., dissenting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).