Paula Y. Williams v. Office of the Chief Judge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that an employment relationship likely existed where the first, second, and fifth Knight factors weighed in the plaintiff’s favor
• finding in evidence of joint employer status with respect to the fifth factor because “[t]his was not a temporary assignment or a contract job that would end at the completion of some task”
• vacating summary judgment for a putative employer and holding that this factor favored an employment relationship because the plaintiff was hired “as a long-term, at-will employee,” not for “a temporary assignment or a contract job that would end at the completion of some task”
• “whether and how to award prejudgment interest also lies in the discretion of the district court”
• \This was not a temporary assignment or a contract job that would end at the completion of some task.\
• “This was not a temporary assignment or a contract job that would end at the completion of some task.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).