Paula S. Skorup v. Modern Door Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding evidence that employer was “flustered” and “angry” about employee’s doctor-imposed work restrictions did not establish that employer regarded her as disabled
• “To establish that the ADA applies to her condition, [plaintiffl needed to identify what requirements posed by the class ... jobs (or ... by a broad range of ... jobs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).