Paula L. COFFEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOBBS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC. and John Bryson, Defendants-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that concessions made solely for the purposes of summary judgment are “no longer effective” if the motion is denied
• finding that “the ultimate question of discrimination vel non” requires the plaintiff to introduce “sufficient evidence to support a finding that [the defendant] intentionally discriminated against her[.]” (emphasis added; internal citation, quotation marks, and edits omitted
• jury trial on the merits, where no directed verdict motion was made
• “Because this case has been fully tried on the merits, we need not determine whether [plaintiff] established a prima facie case…[r]ather, we proceed directly to the ultimate question of discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).